5 minutes read time
Patients are often treated with complex, multi-drug regimens involving serotonergic agents in today’s healthcare landscape. While these combinations are necessary for managing conditions like depression, anxiety, and psychosis, they increase the risk of serotonin syndrome — a rare but potentially life-threatening adverse reaction.
Clinical Decision Solutions (CDS) are a key safety net. By delivering real-time drug interaction alerts and evidence-based recommendations, MIMS CDS helps clinicians detect high-risk drug combinations early and support safer prescribing decisions at the point of care.
Understanding Serotonin Syndrome
Serotonin syndrome occurs when serotonergic activity is excessively stimulated in the central nervous system, typically due to drug–drug interactions or abrupt changes in therapy. It can develop within hours and may include symptoms such as:
- Neuromuscular: tremors, myoclonus, hyperreflexia
- Autonomic: hyperthermia, tachycardia, diaphoresis
- Mental status: agitation, confusion, hallucinations
If not recognised early, the condition can escalate rapidly to seizures, rhabdomyolysis, or death [1][2].
Clinical reviews indicate that serotonin syndrome often goes unrecognised or misdiagnosed, particularly in psychiatric and ICU settings [1]. A prospective study identified serotonin syndrome in 7.8% of all ICU admissions over a six-month period, with most patients receiving multiple serotonergic drugs, underlining the need for greater awareness and enhanced monitoring tools like CDS [3].

Many medications used in psychiatry have serotonergic effects, and the risk rises when these agents are combined. High-risk classes include:
- SSRIs (e.g. fluoxetine, citalopram)
- SNRIs (e.g. venlafaxine, duloxetine)
- Tricyclic antidepressants (e.g. clomipramine)
- MAOIs (e.g. phenelzine, moclobemide)
- Atypical antipsychotics with serotonergic properties (e.g. olanzapine)
- Others: lithium, mirtazapine, tramadol, trazodone, linezolid, St. John’s Wort
Even non-psychiatric medications can precipitate serotonin syndrome. Tramadol, commonly used for pain control, and linezolid, a broad-spectrum antibiotic, may be implicated in serotonin toxicity when combined with antidepressants [4][5].
An analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database revealed a significant risk of serotonin syndrome with SSRIs combined with antidepressants, SNRIs and opioids, particularly tramadol and fentanyl — highlighting the importance of careful clinical vigilance [4].
Recognising Risk in Practice
Several clinical risk factors increase the likelihood of serotonin syndrome:
- Prescribing multiple serotonergic agents
- Rapid titration of dose
- Inadequate washout periods between serotonergic medications
- Use of over-the-counter serotonergic agents or herbal supplements
The Role of Clinical Decision Solutions (CDS)
Given the complexity of psychiatric prescribing and the risks associated with serotonergic polypharmacy, there is growing emphasis on the use of integrated CDS tools. These systems help prescribers by:
- Flagging potential drug–drug interactions involving serotonergic agents
- Suggesting appropriate washout periods during medication transitions
- Highlighting lesser-known risks from non-prescription agents such as herbal supplements
Studies have shown that CDS implementation is associated with reductions in preventable drug events, improved documentation of interventions, and better alignment with evidence-based protocols [6][7].

When embedded into electronic health records and prescribing platforms, CDS tools provide timely, localised alerts that support clinician workflow without creating unnecessary interruptions. These alerts can improve clinical decision-making, especially in high-risk contexts such as psychiatry, where the margin for error is narrow.
Organisations using regionally tailored solutions, including those developed by providers like MIMS, have reported improved prescriber awareness and better medication safety outcomes. Their tools reflect local formulary considerations and help ensure that clinical decisions remain both contextually appropriate and patient centred.
With MIMS Clinical Decision Solutions, prescribers are provided with vital tools and modules to reduce the risk of serotonin syndrome.
- Drug Interaction Alert Module: identifies clinically significant interactions between serotonergic agents, provides guidance on symptom monitoring and recommendations to support safer care in psychiatric patients.
The Clinical Takeaway
Serotonin syndrome is serious, fast-moving, and preventable. With psychiatric patients frequently prescribed multiple serotonergic medications, clinicians must remain vigilant. Integrated clinical decision solutions, when properly designed and implemented, plays a vital role in identifying high-risk combinations, preventing avoidable harm, and enhancing the safety of prescribing practices.
References
- Boyer EW, Shannon M. The serotonin syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 17;352(11):1112-20. See more
- Prakash S, Shah CS, Prakash A. Serotonin syndrome controversies: A need for consensus. World J Crit Care Med. 2024 Jun 9;13(2):94707. See more
- Prakash S, Rathore C, Rana K. The prevalence of serotonin syndrome in an intensive care unit: A prospective observational study. J Crit Care. 2021 Jun;63:92-97. See more
- Novella A, Elli C, Pasina L. Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors and Risk of Serotonin Syndrome as Consequence of Drug-Drug Interactions: analysis of The FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Med Princ Pract. 2025 Apr 25:1-12. See more
- Woytowish MR, Maynor LM. Clinical relevance of linezolid-associated serotonin toxicity. Ann Pharmacother. 2013 Mar;47(3):388-97. See more
- Helmons PJ, Suijkerbuijk BO, Nannan Panday PV et al. Drug-drug interaction checking assisted by clinical decision support: a return on investment analysis. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015 Jul;22(4):764-72. See more
- Pruszydlo MG, Walk-Fritz SU, Hoppe-Tichy T et al. Development and evaluation of a computerised clinical decision support system for switching drugs at the interface between primary and tertiary care. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Nov 27;12:137. See more